An early-stage startup that tries five distribution channels at once usually learns nothing from any of them: volumes are too small, attention is split and results blur together. The practical answer is to choose one main channel for a defined period, with a written hypothesis about what should happen, a few metrics, and a rule for deciding at the end whether to persist, adjust or switch. The purpose of the first months is not to grow on every front, but to understand where your customers are and what convinces them.
In short
- One channel at a time, for a defined trial period, usually six to twelve weeks.
- Choose the channel based on where customers already look for solutions, not on what is most comfortable for you.
- Write a testable hypothesis before you start.
- Measure a few things along the whole path, from first contact to sales conversation.
- At the end of the period, decide explicitly: persist, adjust or switch.
Why only one
Every channel has a learning curve. The first weeks on LinkedIn, at a trade fair, with a partner or with cold email are spent almost entirely on learning how that channel works: which message gets replies, which people respond, how long it takes. If you split the same time across five channels, none of them gets past this phase, and you end up with five weak results that support no conclusions.
Focusing does not mean ignoring opportunities that arrive through other routes: an introduction from a contact should always be taken. It means that the work you plan, measure and improve every week sits on one channel.
How to choose the channel
Start from the customer. Ask current customers or your most interested prospects:
- where they last heard about a solution like yours;
- whom they ask for advice when choosing a supplier;
- which events, groups, publications or associations they follow;
- how they bought the last similar tool.
The answers usually point to two or three plausible channels. Compare them on four criteria:
- closeness to the customer: how likely you are to meet the right people there;
- speed of feedback: how quickly you can tell whether it works;
- cost: money and, above all, founder hours;
- repeatability: if it works, can you do it again and have others do it?
In B2B aimed at SMEs, for example, channels such as trade associations, partners who already serve those customers, or industry events can offer direct access to decision-makers. In software for developers, documentation, technical communities and content matter more. There is no right channel in general: there is the right one for your customer today.
Write the hypothesis
Before you start, write one sentence with this structure: "If we do this activity on this channel, aimed at this type of customer, by this date we will get this result."
For example: "If we contact twenty production managers at manufacturing companies in the Veneto region every week through their trade association, within eight weeks we will have at least six in-depth conversations."
The numbers in the example are illustrative: yours depend on your market and product. What matters is that the hypothesis is precise enough to be proven wrong.
What to measure
Measure a few things, but along the whole path:
- activity: how many contacts, pieces of content, events or meetings you did;
- response: how many people reacted;
- qualification: how many of them match your ideal customer;
- conversations: how many reached a real discussion of the problem;
- outcome: pilots, proposals, contracts.
Alongside the numbers, keep qualitative notes: customers' phrases, objections, recurring questions. They often explain the numbers better than the numbers themselves.
Decide at the end of the period
On the set date, reread the hypothesis and the results and choose one of three routes:
- persist: the channel works, even on a small scale. Now work on making it more efficient and repeatable;
- adjust: there are signals, but something needs to change, for example the message, the segment or the format. Restart with a new hypothesis on the same channel for a short period;
- switch: after a serious attempt, the signals are weak. Move to the second channel on your list, carrying over what you learned about message and customer.
Write down the decision and the reason. In six months you will need it to reconstruct what you tried.
Common mistakes
- Switching channels too early: two weeks without replies usually tells you little. Stick to the period you set, unless the signals are clearly negative.
- Changing three variables at once: if you change message, segment and format at the same time, you will not know what made the difference.
- Delegating too soon: in the first weeks it helps for a founder to run the channel personally, because the conversations are the main source of learning.
- Confusing activity with results: posting a lot or attending many events is not an outcome. What counts is how many useful conversations come out of it.
- Not keeping records: without a table updated every week, on decision day you will rely on memory and impressions.
How much time to commit
A channel has to be tried with enough effort to produce signals. Decide in advance how many hours a week you will put in and who will do it, and protect that time in the calendar as you would a customer meeting. An experiment run in spare moments produces results you cannot interpret.
What to do this week
- Ask the four channel questions to at least five customers or prospects.
- List two or three plausible channels and compare them on the four criteria.
- Pick one and set the length of the trial period.
- Write the hypothesis as one testable sentence.
- Prepare a weekly table with the five metrics and space for notes.
- Put the date of the final decision in the calendar.
- If you want to talk through your channel choice with someone outside the team, get in touch.
In the community you can compare notes with founders testing similar channels, and in Resources you will find a template for tracking experiments.
Subscribe to Dispatch, the PATAVIUM newsletter, for practical tools to build your startup every week.